Bullying is bad enough in its traditional forms: verbal slanders, hurtful rumors, physical shoving and intimidation. However, in the past few years, kids have also started misusing technology to harass their peers. Cyberbullying , as it is called, can take many forms. It includes sending cruel e-mail messages, creating Web sites that have stories, cartoons or pictures ridiculing others, and breaking into an e-mail account and sending private material to others. Cyberbullying also includes tricking someone through instant messaging to reveal personal information and then forwarding that information to others. It can also take the form of using cell phones to send hurtful text messages and embarrassing pictures. Because adults are usually less technically savvy than teens, they might find it difficult to address bullying or even understand the adolescent online social norms that often support it. Many teens believe their free-speech rights trump any violations of privacy or harm they inflict on others. Some teens also believe that what happens amateur golf tournament online should stay online; so telling an adult about cyberbullying incidents would violate a strong social norm. There is also the perception that technology creates the illusion of invisibility. If students believe they are unlikely to get caught, it encourages them to engage in the behavior. Additionally, students who have a lower social status in face-to-face situations may feel more comfortable bullying online.

What do you get when you combine one unemployed actor with one stir-crazy artist, and then quickbooks online throw them both into a room with a stack of gossip tabloids and a camera? My pal Jeff Polage is an excellent pantomime and has more acting talent in his pinky than most of these dullards we see on the big screen these days. Here are some of the results of our celebrity inspired collaboration: Kevin Federline Jessica Simpson Tom Cruise Anna Nicole Smith Arnold Shwarzenegger Goldie Hawn Paris Hilton More paintings coming soon....

[ 3 Pioneers. (l-r) Doc Searls, David Weinberger & Jerry Michalski. Photos by Shel ] Note --This is sort of a personal diary. If you want a more journalist and comprehensive view of what happened yesterday at Supernova, go read Sam Perry at Conferenza , the excellent executive conference reporting site. I'm not certain why I've never attended a Supernova Conference. The event, produced by Kevin Werbach has had a sterling reputation since it started in the Palo Alto Holiday Inn back in 2002. It has experimented each year in interesting ways, and has always drawn prominent social media community members. I went yesterday to Supernova " Challenge Day" held at the San Francisco branch of the Wharton School which turned out to be an excellent venue for panel presentations and old fashioned kind of social networking where you met people face to face. I attended four panels and enjoyed each for different reasons. I was late to the opener, which had Societe's Jerry Michalski citi bank credit card moderating Cluetrain co-stars Doc Searls and David Weinberger , who talked about several of their favorite themes--personal control of your personal data online, open source collaboration benefits and Doc's brilliant vision of an intention economy. I've seen these three industry pioneers more than a few times, yet I remain slightly in awe of their thinking and their presence. I wish I'd been able to get there earlier.

Great article in Wired at: http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,71763-0.html?tw=rss.index At first sight, a computer is a system that seems "clean." Early mainframes were housed in dust-free rooms bathed in unvarying white light. Nobody ever got physically dirty handling a laptop. The computer-using proverb "garbage in, garbage out" is just a metaphor; nothing physical goes into a computer, and nothing physical comes out of it. Then again, why would a "clean" system require so many filters? Spam filters, search filters, surf filters? Why would stuff we encounter on a computer screen be capable of making us feel dirty, or "infecting" our clean machines with a virus? Just as every animal has a mouth and an ass, with processing stuff in between, a computer operating system has inputs, processing and outputs. We input content through a keyboard, a modem, a drawing tablet, free credit reports USB or Firewire ports. Useful stuff is output via screen, printer, speakers or over the internet. The useless stuff -- dirty old computer waste -- leaves the system via a little desktop metaphor called the Recycle or Trash bin. It might be refreshing if, one day, the people who made your computer's OS would call a spade a spade. In a section of his conference talk titled "The Geometry of Filth," Adam Jasper Smith gets to the uncomfortable yet unavoidable nub of the matter. "Dirt radiates out from us," he says. "The primal form of this dirt -- the perfect dirt -- is shit."

You all know better than I do that cheaters, braindumps, and accidental-cheaters can do damage to the reputation of your hard-earned passing score or certification. Given the number of questions about related topics: how can i tell if a test-prep site is legitimate? why are betas not offered in country? does Microsoft ever actually do anything about cheaters? what can I tell my friend about the exam i took? does it really matter? what exactly am I agreeing to when i ok the exam non-disclosure agreement (NDA)? what's up with TestKing? ...and the helpful nudging i got from a few members of our esteemed community, we will be having a Live Meeting to talk about what's happening now on this topic (there is a lot happening...), deep cycle battery charger let you know how you can get involved, and hear your concerns and suggestions. The presenters will be Rob Linsky from the certification team, Shon Hong who works on anti-piracy for Microsoft Learning, Robert Williams of CertGuard , Mitch Garvis of lots-of-different-things, and Michael Alligood , who originally brought up the many questions about our NDA that got this whole ball rolling. I think it will be a good discussion. Let me know if you have any related questions in advance. Protecting the integrity of Microsoft Certification (worldwide) May 23, 2007: 7:30 AM PST - Click to register. May 23, 2007: 5:00 PM PST - Click to register

What do you get when you combine one unemployed actor with one stir-crazy artist, and then throw them both into a room with a stack of gossip tabloids and a camera? My pal Jeff Polage is an excellent pantomime and has more acting talent in his pinky than most of these dullards we see on the big screen these days. Here are some of the results of our celebrity inspired collaboration: Kevin Federline Jessica Simpson Tom Cruise Anna Nicole Smith Arnold Shwarzenegger Goldie teacher emails Hawn Paris Hilton More paintings coming soon....

You all know better than I do that cheaters, braindumps, and accidental-cheaters can do damage to the reputation of your hard-earned passing score or certification. dr oogle dentist Given the number of questions about related topics: how can i tell if a test-prep site is legitimate? why are betas not offered in country? does Microsoft ever actually do anything about cheaters? what can I tell my friend about the exam i took? does it really matter? what exactly am I agreeing to when i ok the exam non-disclosure agreement (NDA)? what's up with TestKing? ...and the helpful nudging i got from a few members of our esteemed community, we will be having a Live Meeting to talk about what's happening now on this topic (there is a lot happening...), let you know how you can get involved, and hear your concerns and suggestions. The presenters will be Rob Linsky from the certification team, Shon Hong who works on anti-piracy for Microsoft Learning, Robert Williams of CertGuard , Mitch Garvis of lots-of-different-things, and Michael Alligood , who originally brought up the many questions about our NDA that got this whole ball rolling. I think it will be a good discussion. Let me know if you have any related questions in advance. Protecting the integrity of Microsoft Certification (worldwide) May 23, 2007: 7:30 AM PST - Click to register. May 23, 2007: 5:00 PM PST - Click to register

You all know better than I do that cheaters, braindumps, and accidental-cheaters can do damage to the reputation of your hard-earned passing score or certification. Given the number of questions about related topics: how can i tell if a test-prep site is legitimate? why are betas not offered in country? does Microsoft ever actually do anything about cheaters? what can I tell my friend about the exam i took? does it really matter? what exactly am I agreeing to when i ok the exam non-disclosure agreement (NDA)? what's up with TestKing? ...and the helpful nudging i got from a few members of our esteemed community, we will be having a Live Meeting to talk about what's happening now on this topic (there is a lot happening...), let you know how you can get involved, and hear your concerns and suggestions. The presenters will be Rob Linsky from the certification team, Shon Hong who works on anti-piracy for Microsoft Learning, Robert Williams of CertGuard , Mitch Garvis of lots-of-different-things, and Michael Alligood , who originally brought up the many questions about our NDA that got fundraising ireland this whole ball rolling. I think it will be a good discussion. Let me know if you have any related questions in advance. Protecting the integrity of Microsoft Certification (worldwide) May 23, 2007: 7:30 AM PST - Click to register. May 23, 2007: 5:00 PM PST - Click to register

Great article in Wired at: http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,71763-0.html?tw=rss.index registro dominios register At first sight, a computer is a system that seems "clean." Early mainframes were housed in dust-free rooms bathed in unvarying white light. Nobody ever got physically dirty handling a laptop. The computer-using proverb "garbage in, garbage out" is just a metaphor; nothing physical goes into a computer, and nothing physical comes out of it. Then again, why would a "clean" system require so many filters? Spam filters, search filters, surf filters? Why would stuff we encounter on a computer screen be capable of making us feel dirty, or "infecting" our clean machines with a virus? Just as every animal has a mouth and an ass, with processing stuff in between, a computer operating system has inputs, processing and outputs. We input content through a keyboard, a modem, a drawing tablet, USB or Firewire ports. Useful stuff is output via screen, printer, speakers or over the internet. The useless stuff -- dirty old computer waste -- leaves the system via a little desktop metaphor called the Recycle or Trash bin. It might be refreshing if, one day, the people who made your computer's OS would call a spade a spade. In a section of his conference talk titled "The Geometry of Filth," Adam Jasper Smith gets to the uncomfortable yet unavoidable nub of the matter. "Dirt radiates out from us," he says. "The primal form of this dirt -- the perfect dirt -- is shit."

Great article in Wired at: http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,71763-0.html?tw=rss.index At first sight, a computer is a system that seems "clean." Early mainframes were housed in dust-free rooms bathed in unvarying white light. Nobody ever got physically dirty handling a laptop. The computer-using proverb "garbage in, garbage out" is just a metaphor; nothing physical goes into a computer, and nothing physical spyware doctor download comes out of it. Then again, why would a "clean" system require so many filters? Spam filters, search filters, surf filters? Why would stuff we encounter on a computer screen be capable of making us feel dirty, or "infecting" our clean machines with a virus? Just as every animal has a mouth and an ass, with processing stuff in between, a computer operating system has inputs, processing and outputs. We input content through a keyboard, a modem, a drawing tablet, USB or Firewire ports. Useful stuff is output via screen, printer, speakers or over the internet. The useless stuff -- dirty old computer waste -- leaves the system via a little desktop metaphor called the Recycle or Trash bin. It might be refreshing if, one day, the people who made your computer's OS would call a spade a spade. In a section of his conference talk titled "The Geometry of Filth," Adam Jasper Smith gets to the uncomfortable yet unavoidable nub of the matter. "Dirt radiates out from us," he says. "The primal form of this dirt -- the perfect dirt -- is shit."

pisces Tactics

Great article in Wired at: http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,71763-0.html?tw=rss.index At first sight, a computer is a system that seems "clean." Early mainframes were housed in dust-free rooms bathed in unvarying white light. Nobody ever got physically dirty handling a laptop. The computer-using proverb "garbage in, garbage out" is just a metaphor; nothing physical goes into a computer, and nothing physical comes out of it. Then again, why would a "clean" system require so many filters? Spam filters, search filters, surf filters? Why would stuff we encounter on a computer screen be capable of making us feel dirty, or "infecting" our clean machines with a virus? Just as every animal has a mouth and an ass, with processing stuff in between, a computer operating system has inputs, processing and outputs. We input website hits content through a keyboard, a modem, a drawing tablet, USB or Firewire ports. Useful stuff is output via screen, printer, speakers or over the internet. The useless stuff -- dirty old computer waste -- leaves the system via a little desktop metaphor called the Recycle or Trash bin. It might be refreshing if, one day, the people who made your computer's OS would call a spade a spade. In a section of his conference talk titled "The Geometry of Filth," Adam Jasper Smith gets to the uncomfortable yet unavoidable nub of the matter. "Dirt radiates out from us," he says. "The primal form of this dirt -- the perfect dirt -- is shit."